Even though I think SiteGround sucks and is ridiculously overpriced shared hosting with fake reviews, I’ll help you speed up your site on their hosting by improving LCP, TTFB, and web vitals.
First off, you’ll want to use a separate optimization plugin since SiteGround Optimizer does a poor job with core web vitals (I recommend FlyingPress). You’ll still use SiteGround Optimizer for Memcached and a few other features, but not much else. Next, you’ll want to use Cloudflare APO or FlyingProxy which are faster, cheaper, and more reliable compared to SiteGround’s CDN.
These 2 things alone should make a huge improvement to core web vitals. SiteGround will probably tell you their plugin + CDN are better, but they’re only telling you this because it’s their product. This is one of the reasons I don’t like them since they lie more than any host I’ve used.
I’ll cover a few other ways to speed up your slow SiteGround website while also reducing CPU usage. I recommend using GTmetrix as your main testing tool, then KeyCDN’s Performance Test or SpeedVitals for testing TTFB in 10-40 locations. For reference, my TTFB is ~100ms globally, I pass web vitals, and here’s my GTmetrix report. Just saying this because – this guide will work!
- Configure FlyingPress
- Configure SiteGround Optimizer
- Setup Cloudflare’s APO
- Use Cloudflare’s DNS
- Resize images for mobile
- Disable plugins on specific pages/posts
- Remove old plugin tables with WP-Optimize
- Configure SiteGround Security
- Choose the closest SiteGround data center
- Optimize your page builder
- Upgrade to PHP 8+
- Replace wp-cron with a real cron job
- Don’t upgrade to SiteGround’s cloud hosting
- Stop using SiteGround
- Use faster LiteSpeed/cloud hosting
1. Configure FlyingPress
This is why you should use FlyingPress. I was previously using WP Rocket and can confirm FlyingPress is definitely faster while doing a better job optimizing core web vitals. You could use Perfmatters, but it doesn’t support critical CSS and a few other key features. The main benefit of Perfmatters is it has a script manager for disabling plugins on pages/posts they’re not used, but you can do this in Asset CleanUp (free). Either way, you’ll want to use one of these optimization plugins on top of SiteGround Optimizer. When configuring FlyingPress with SiteGround Optimizer, the main thing is to avoid enabling duplicate settings in both plugins. I found the easiest way to do this is to configure FlyingPress normally, then only enable specific settings in SiteGround Optimizer (which I listed in step #2). You’ll want to read my full FlyingPress tutorial, but I showed some of the most important screenshots below. I also have a tutorial on the Perfmatters settings and WP Rocket settings.You may want to disable SiteGround Optimizer while configuring these settings.
- Load unused CSS – you have 3 options here. Remove unused CSS is the most powerful but will require excluding stylesheets if they break your site. Otherwise, “on user interaction” in the next best setting. FlyingPress’ documentation explains the difference between the 3.
- Lazy render HTML elements – similar to lazy loading images only this can be done with specific areas of your website that load below the fold (comments, footer, Elementor/Divi sections, etc). You’ll want to see this YouTube video from FlyingPress for full instructions.
- Exclude script from defer – if enabling this breaks your website, see common exclusions.
- Delay JavaScript – delay all is most powerful, but you’ll need to see common exclusions. Otherwise, choose “delay selected” then delay these common third-party JavaScript files.
- Preload fonts – after you host fonts locally using the “optimize Google Fonts” setting, view your font files in GTmetrix’s Waterfall chart and preload any fonts that load above the fold. It’s also a good idea to convert your fonts to woff2 which are faster than .ttf, .woff, etc.
- Exclude above the fold images – when you’re asked to set a number, this should be the number of images that usually load above the fold. For me, it’s 3 (my logo, sidebar image, and the first image I use at the top of posts). This can significantly improve your LCP score.
- Disable Block Editor CSS – if you’re not using Gutenberg, enable it. This removes a CSS file that will otherwise load across your site which is needed for Gutenberg to work. But if you use Elementor or another page builder instead, you don’t need it (it just adds bloat).
- Disable WP Cron – when you get to step #11, you can use this setting to disable wp-cron.

If you prefer to use Perfmatters instead of FlyingPres, see these settings to configure it with SiteGround Optimizer. Similarly, you will want to avoid enabling duplicate settings.
2. Configure SiteGround Optimizer
Not that you’re using FlyingPress to address more core web vitals than SiteGround Optimizer would have, you only need SG Optimizer to address a few extra things not found in FlyingPress. Configure the settings normally except the following:- Disable dynamic + file-based caching.
- Disable browser caching.
- Disable Heartbeat control.
- Disable scheduled database maintenance settings.
- Disable all frontend settings.
- Disable lazy loading.
Environment – HTTPS enforce and GZIP should be on. Browser caching, Heartbeat, and database cleanup are handled by FlyingPress – so leave them disabled in SiteGround Optimizer.
Frontend Optimization – all settings should be off since FlyingPress handles these.
Media – only use this for image compression, WebP, and setting a maximum image width. FlyingPress does a better job with lazy loading, so leave this disabled in SiteGround Optimizer.
3. Setup Cloudflare’s APO
Your hosting/CDN are the 2 main TTFB factors – both need to be fast. If you chose a data center close to visitors, you don’t need a CDN. But if you have visitors far away from your SiteGround server, Cloudflare’s APO improves TTFB in multiple locations by caching HTML. Compared to SiteGround’s CDN, Cloudflare has 100+ more PoPs and is $5/mo. FlyingProxy costs $10/mo and uses APO with more Cloudflare features: prioritized routing on more PoPs, firewall, Enterprise-level DDoS protection, and image optimization. It’s faster than just using APO while providing better security, and it was developed by Gijo (from FlyingPress). I don’t recommend SiteGround’s CDN because you have to use their DNS to use it. This was previously blocked by Google and caused 2M SiteGround domains to be deindexed. Getting blocked by Google is not something you want to risk, especially if you do SEO. SiteGround’s CDN also uses Google Cloud which has a smaller network than Cloudflare with less features.| RocketCDN | SiteGround CDN | FlyingCDN | Cloudflare APO | FlyingProxy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDN provider | StackPath | Google Cloud | BunnyCDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| PoPs | 73 | 176 | 114 | 285 | 285 |
| Tbps speed | 100 | Not listed | 80 | 197 | 197 |
| Dynamic caching | x | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ |
| Image compression | x | x | ✓ | x | ✓ |
| WebP | x | x | ✓ | x | ✓ |
| Firewall | x | x | ✓ | x | ✓ |
| Enterprise DDoS protection | x | x | x | x | ✓ |
| Bandwidth | Unknown, but not unlimited as advertised | Unmetered | Unlimited | Unlimited | 100GB |
| Monthly price | $8.99 | $14.99 | $.03/GB | $5 | $10 |
- Change your DNS to Cloudflare [screenshot].
- Proxy traffic through Cloudflare’s CDN [screenshot].
- Purchase APO in Cloudflare (Speed → Optimization → APO).
- Install the Cloudflare plugin.
- Create an API token and add it to the plugin.
- Purge your cache in your cache plugin(s), then Cloudflare.
- Confirm APO is working using uptrends.com.
Configure Cloudflare Settings
I have a full tutorial on this. It will probably take 10 minutes but is definitely worth it since Cloudflare has a ton of features that can improve both speed/security. If you setup Cloudflare through a third-party service like FlyingProxy, there’s no need to setup Cloudflare’s dashboard.
Test Your TTFB
Once APO is setup, test your site in KeyCDN’s performance test or SpeedVitals which measure TTFB in 10-40 locations. You’ll want to test your site 3 times to make sure caching is working and your CDN uses the closest data center. I use Rocket.net with their free Cloudflare Enterprise who averages a <100ms global TTFB. APO helps but it’s unlikely you’ll get 100ms on SiteGround.
4. Use Cloudflare’s DNS
You don’t want this to happen to you (you can read people’s angry comments on Twitter).
Plus, Cloudflare’s DNS is consistently performant/reliable on dnsperf.com.
5. Resize Images For Mobile
If you have poor mobile/LCP scores, one of the reasons is that most cache plugins/CDNs don’t resize images for mobile. You have 3 main options here:- Use ShortPixel Adaptive Images.
- Purchase Cloudflare Pro for $20/mo which includes image resizing.
- Use FlyingCDN from FlyingPress which includes Bunny Optimizer for image optimization.
6. Disable Plugins On Specific Pages/Posts
Disabling plugins in areas of your site they’re not being used reducing CSS/JavaScript. Contact forms, social sharing, and WooCommerce plugins are known for loading files across your entire website. In the example below, I disabled a social sharing plugin everywhere but posts. You can use the script manager in Perfmatters or Asset CleanUp which is free. They both include a “test mode” in the settings which lets you test this since disabling certain files might break your site.
You can enable dependencies in the Perfmatters script manager settings to see plugins using jQuery (known for slowing down websites). Try avoiding jQuery-dependent plugins if possible.
7. Remove Old Plugin Tables With WP-Optimize
Cache plugins also don’t remove tables left behind by old plugins you deleted. Install WP-Optimize and go through your tables. If you see “remove,” it means you installed an old plugin, deleted it, and it left behind tables. Remove it if you don’t plan on using that plugin again. You may also notice certain plugins add lots of database overhead. I noticed Rank Math’s Analytics were, so I disabled that module and get my analytics directly from GA/Search Console. You can use FlyingPress or SiteGround Optimizer for regular database cleanups, but if you find yourself deleting plugins frequently, use WP-Optimize to clean their tables from your database.
8. Configure SiteGround Security
Blocking unwanted requests lightens the load on the server too (this is also why using a firewall like Cloudflare’s WAF is so important). SiteGround’s security plugin can disable XML-RPC, move your wp-login page, limit login attempts, and has several other security features. It has solid reviews and is simple to set up. Just make sure to specify a custom login URL and use two-factor authentication in the settings.
9. Choose The Closest SiteGround Data Center
When you buy any hosting plan, choose the data center closest to visitors. When visitors are far away from the data center, use a CDN with full page caching and ideally take advantage of other CDN features like Argo Smart Routing + load balancing. These reduce TTFB when visitors are far away (with the right CDN, using a close data center barely matters).
10. Optimize Your Page Builder
I have separate tutorials for speeding up Elementor and Divi. Check your coverage report in Chrome Dev Tools to see how much CSS/JavaScript they’re adding to your site. This can usually be reduced by using their built-in performance settings, disabling unused fonts/font icons, and disabling Gutenberg’s wp-block-library (in FlyingPress). I recommend viewing Perfmatters’ documentation on common exclusions for Elementor (or Divi) which you can apply to FlyingPress. However, I also recommend looking into something like GeneratePress (what I use) which is lightweight and doesn’t add nearly as much CSS + JS. Especially when you start adding more Elementor plugins, your site gets bloated very quickly.
11. Upgrade To PHP 8+
Login to Site Tools → Devs → PHP Manager, then upgrade to at least PHP 8. Even though SiteGround says their Ultrafast PHP can improve TTFB by up to 50%, it’s a bold claim and you probably won’t get anywhere near that type of result. Regardless, it’s always a good idea to keep your PHP version updated as long as your theme and plugins are compatible.
12. Replace WP-Cron With A Real Cron Job
SiteGround has a tutorial, but it’s easy. The first step is to disable wp-cron which you can do in FlyingPress. You can also do this this manually by opening your wp-config.php file and disable WordPress cron by adding the code before the line: /* That’s all, stop editing! Happy blogging. */define('DISABLE_WP_CRON', true);
Login to Site Tools → Devs → Cron Jobs. Create a cron job using the code to execute twice per hour. As SiteGround says, “replace /home/customer/www/yourdomain.com/public_html with the actual path to your WordPress application’s core file.” This can also help reduce CPU usage.
cd /home/customer/www/yourdomain.com/public_html; wp cron event run --due-now >/dev/null 2>&1
13. Don’t Upgrade To SiteGround’s Cloud Hosting
I’ve already used it and am glad I don’t anymore. Many people upgrade from GoGeek to SiteGround’s cloud hosting in hopes of a faster website or to fix CPU limit issues. Don’t do it. Like many people reported, it doesn’t always fix CPU issues even though it starts at $100/mo. Big waste of money considering it’s not very fast and still uses slow technology like SATA SSDs.
14. Stop Using SiteGround
Here are my top 10 reasons:
- Slow hardware/software – SiteGround is shared hosting (cloud is faster) on Apache servers (LiteSpeed is faster) with SATA SSDs (NVMe storage is 6-7x faster), Memcached (Redis is faster), and MySQL (MariaDB is faster). It’s a big reason why SiteGround is slower than even many shared hosts and is notorious for CPU limits.
- History of TTFB issues – in 2019, Backlinko found SiteGround had the slowest TTFB of any host tested. Today, SiteGround says they use Google Cloud’s N2 machine family which isn’t optimized for performance (it’s “balanced” instead). When you search Facebook groups that aren’t controlled by SG (like WP Speed Matters), you can find many complaints about their slow TTFB and poor ethics.
- CPU limits – SiteGround’s servers are sensitive to CPU limits which constantly force you to upgrade. I went from GrowBig to their $120+/mo cloud hosting plan just to fix it. Like many people, I ended up leaving and never had CPU issues again.
- Expensive renewals – after 1 year, you’re paying $25/mo for their GrowBig plan. Then you add $14.99/mo for their CDN and it’s $40/mo for shared hosting. Ripoff.
- Things get messy – just like you saw in this tutorial, you have to configure 2 cache plugins. And even with Cloudflare’s APO, this still doesn’t resize images for mobile.
- Replace products with their own inferior products – they’ve already replaced their own (previously fast) servers with Google Cloud’s slow N1 machine family, cPanel with Site Tools, Cloudflare with their own CDN, and SiteGround Optimizer has performance + compatibility issues. Then they claim their products are better.
- Lack of accountability – just like you saw when their DNS got blocked or in SG Optimizer’s support threads, they blame other companies, themes, or plugins for their mistakes. They lie about how their CDN is essentially the same as Cloudflare. They also blame CPU limits on bots, Heartbeat, etc. Don’t trust anything they say.
- Fake reviews – SiteGround hires Facebook admins to post reviews pretending to be “real” customers. The same admins remove negative SiteGround comments, serve as SiteGround’s support agents, and constantly like SiteGround-supporting comments. These groups constantly favor SiteGround because it’s a fake illusion.
- Legally threatens people who write bad reviews – read this Reddit thread. SiteGround also sent me a cease and desist letter after I changed my review of them. They do this because their TOS includes an NDA they use to demand you take down any mentions of “SiteGround” from your website. If they don’t like your review, expect a letter. This is why you don’t see bad SiteGround reviews but mine.

15. Use Faster LiteSpeed/Cloud Hosting
ChemiCloud – faster LiteSpeed hosting, faster NVMe storage, and a perfect 5/5 star TrustPilot rating with several reviews of people who either moved or were about to purchase SiteGround. No need to buy a premium cache plugin since you’ll use the free LiteSpeed Cache which does a better job with web vitals. QUIC.cloud’s CDN is also faster (and often cheaper) than SiteGround which you can configure using my tutorial. And you’re much less likely to have to upgrade from CPU limits since LiteSpeed is more efficient and they don’t have strict limits. It’s cheaper, faster, and scalable since you can add CPU cores/RAM using their Turbo+ Boost add-on if traffic grows. NameHero is very similar but they cost more and only use NVMe storage in their US data center. Hostinger/GreekGeeks have many scam reports if you look at their TrustPilot reviews or Reddit.










Cloudways – similar to Rocket.net between cloud hosting, NVMe, MariaDB, Cloudflare Enterprise, and they use Redis Object Cache Pro. However, their Cloudflare Enterprise costs $5/mo and doesn’t have APO, they use PHP-FPM instead of LiteSpeed’s faster PHP, support is worse, and they were acquired by DigitalOcean who raised prices. Still faster than SiteGround (including SG’s cloud hosting) and I was using the Vultr High Frequency plan before Rocket.net.

























Why is my website slow on SiteGround?
SiteGround is slow because their cache plugin does a poor job with core web vitals and their hosting runs on inferior hardware + software. This can also lead to high CPU usage.
Why is SiteGround’s TTFB slow?
SiteGround uses a balanced Google Cloud machine family (N2) which is slower than compute-optimized families (like C2). It’s also shared hosting with limited resources.
















Actually my WordPress website with LearnDash, WooCommerce and BuddyBoss is running faster with SiteGround, like significantly faster.
I have tested out Rocket.net + FlyingPress and I don’t get has good results versus SiteGround SpeedOptimizer for both logged-in users or not logged-in users.
Curious to how everything was configured (FlyingPress, SG Optimizer, CDN, object cache, etc).
Redis Pro alone is much faster than Memcached, Cloudflare Enterprise is also faster, and Rocket.net gives you more resources. Something may have been configured incorrectly because this is the first time I’ve heard SG is faster.
Tom,
Thank you so much for this article, it has absolutely transformed my core web vitals.
The combination of the flying press plugin and reverting to Cloudflare, while upgrading to their APO has put me at 95+ on the speed index. That’s even with Siteground Hosting, which won’t be staying come renewal time!
Thanks again,
Steve
All good news Steve! I just rewrote this a couple weeks ago with a bunch of improvements, so glad to hear they’re working.
Ahh well when it comes to renew you’ve probably seen my recommendations but lmk if you have questions when the time comes. Aside from speed/price, you’d be supporting much more ethical hosts :)
Thank you so much, Tom!
I’m tracking down many reasons why my site recently bombed in SEO but, thanks to you, I know what’s not causing it now. My SiteSpeed went from total fail to 90 on every metric.
Any time Nick! I would definitely check which date traffic started to fall and see if there was a Google algo update. Lots of fluctuations the past couple month with Helpful Content update and others.
I am trying to speed up my website, however, it appears that cloudflare is slowing it down (according to google page speed insights) rather than speeding it up. I have no cloudflare rules set up, can this be this is the issue?
There TTFB is appalling. This is nothing short of ripping customers off. The issue points to them either overcrowding servers, throttling performance or old technology.
There ttfb really does lag behind others. Dissapointing and something they need to address in the future. The NGINX cache is probably an issue along with slow servers. Looks like they are trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes with the caching instead of investing in better servers.
Hi Tom,
Very interesting article and I have added some of your tips and procedures relating to CloudFlare and the Cron Jobs via SiteGround and seeing improvements.
I do have a number of observations and these seem to highlight a lot of coyness on the part of many of the players in this game of smoke and mirrors and perhaps a little dishonesty; not one of these players want to put their hands up and say, yes, I must do better, that issue you are observing is our fault.
On themes, I use Divi and yes it is a bit of a beast but on testing it has come to my attention that there isn’t any difference between it and the lightweight Kadence Theme based on blocks. Both as basic installs (no other plugins installed) start well and then go downhill equally, once you start adding all the necessary plugins required for the site type (WooCommerce, Toolset, etc.).
I’ll add that any improvement of page builders’ load time is welcome and I note the Oxygen theme you mentioned and how it does layout. On top of this I do believe that the Divi Theme is ging on a diet this year and some of this relates to shortcode removal, hopefully the areas relating to layout structure. Dare I say it, maybe Divi will be re-written to be based on the block editor? That would be novel. I keep going back to Divi, after looking at alternatives, because the alternatives, block based or otherwise, just don’t afford a good experience in terms of workflow.
On the hosting side of things with SiteGround, I do note the TTFB is flagged in GTMetrix on an initial test and then on subsequent runs improves, due to caching of course. I have tested with various caching plugins, SG Optimiser and W3 Total Cache with not improvements. I was sceptical at first but after trying out WP Rocket on one of my sites I was surprised on how well it improved on GTMetrix results. The initial run was still not great with the TTFB but when applied the configurations in your article, things improved again, Where I was seeing initial C and D scores and 3 seconds LCP, on the first GTMetrix run, now I am seeing B and a 1.3 second LCP consistently. Reduce initial server response time is still being flagged with SiteGround though.
My Last observation is cynical and a bit sceptical of al this speed metrics. Between all the testing options (GTMetrix, Pingdom, Lighthouse via Chrome) none of them is consistent and all vary in their reports. At the same time, for all intents and purposes, when I eyeball the sites I have made and watch them load, perceptually they all load fast enough and despite all the tweaking, I see little difference each time.
I look to the likes of Google and I question their agenda on all of this. Look at any of their pages and there’s not much to look at visually. Very boring indeed and I wonder where those of us who build sites with some sort of visual flair are left. And don’t start me on Google’s documentation the covering services they provide; really good UX?
That is one of the most accurate descriptions of what’s going on in these industries now.
Google wants good core web vitals but none of their sites have great scores. They want good UX but most of their documentation is all text and usually not practical at all for WordPress. Everyone is saying their service (hosting, builder, cache plugin) is the best/fastest but it’s just not true.
Those are all interesting but seemingly very true observations. As a blogger trying to give people accurate info, it’s honestly been very difficult to make sense of it all.
I joined Siteground because they are supposed to be the best, fastest, as you mention in your other blog. Now, from the same person I read I have to move away. I have a lot of miss information here.
Hey Simon, IMO they used to be really good up until last year when they made all these changes to prices, reduced support, Site Tools, cancelling accounts, etc. Last year, I stopped supporting them (as did many others)… I believe that’s when Backlinko’s test also came out finding SiteGround’s TTFB is now very slow. A lot has changed with them in a short time and I did my best to change my content to reflect that.
Hi Tom !
Great and clear information for me who just experienced a very slow website last 2 days. I went through all topics and it helps me to check all setup.
Nevertheless, my slow down was due to WP cron job consuming lot of CPU. It was solved by deactivating it and installing Siteground cron job which make a hudge difference coming back to a good GTmetrix score. After, I improved the score with your #5 advice (Combine Google Fonts).
I think cron
Thank you Tom .
Nota : for information about this Siteground cron job , see : tutorials/wordpress/real-cron-job.
It take five minutes and it is very easy todo for a non-system guy like me
Thanks for for mentioning it and glad you got it fixed. I’ll update this tutorial soon to include that as a possible solution.
Yes. That SiteGround Optimizer thing Condenses (“minifies”) all your scripts and StyleSheets into a different script and style sheet.
Any changes you make won’t be there until a day or two later and it will
totally screw up your web site’s performance, and make your web site a miserable experience.
You’ll also notice that your facebook pixel somehow is installed on some third-party web sites you’ve never heard of, based in Eastern Europe.
DO NOT USE that SG Optimizer thing. Simply UN-INSTALL IT and REMOVE IT.
Hi been reading through but am just not sure what’s my best option i have 50 ish sites and i use Avada theme on all of them and its a bit bloated but been fine for last 7 years on site ground then as you said things have gone down hill big time. my speeds are garbage now in google insights and gt Metrix am not sure what’s happened. Now the question is where do i go with 50sites using like 1tb of disk, 12g of ram and 3 CPU., But around same as siteground where i pay about £120 a month.
I would personally try Cloudways or Gridpane. Both should be cheaper/faster than SiteGround. For example, for 12GB RAM 3 CPU on SiteGround you would pay about the same amount (about $135) at Cloudways but would get 16GB RAM 6 CPU. SiteGround’s cloud hosting is pretty bad, I was using them as well. Otherwise, you may want to post your question in the WordPress Hosting Facebook Group and get some feedback there. Lots of knowledgable people.
Thanks for the great information – some real good advice for people like me. I will note however that in the time since publishing the performance of sitegrounds seems to be better than Cloudways. (I tested both of your sites on Google PageSpeed and GT Metrix)
Ahh here’s why.
I had the SG Optimizer plugin configured on the SiteGround test server (they made some updates and I have a tutorial on configuring the SG Optimizer settings) so I used the test server temporarily just to update my tutorial with newer screenshots. I just deactivated SG Optimizer so now the sites have the same environment. Sorry for the confusion.
No worries on the confusion. That certainly made a difference.
Hey Tom,
Great article, I stumbled upon it because I have recently decided to purchase and upgrade a few sites from gogeek shared server to sitegrounds VPS (8gb ram / 4 core) but I find that the sites are not much faster (considering the huge price difference) and the TTFB is painfully slow now.
i have another site on Cloudways which is significantly faster. Only downside is that I don’t find cloudways support to be as good as sitegrounds. Would you have any suggestions on where I could find cloudways speed but similes support to siteground?
thanks in advance for your help!
I would take a look at Kinsta or GridPane. I think both only offer phone support but they’re supposed to be good for both. Liquid Web has great support but speeds aren’t as fast as the others.
Hey Tom,
Thank you for this post, gotta say I am a bit confused as it seems different from previous ones you made…so no more recommendation to use siteground and now we shouldn’t use SG optimizer WP rocket?
Hey Kevin,
Sorry about the late reply.
Nope, no more recommending SiteGround and I’m in the middle of updating my tutorials to reflect that – I’m just 1 person trying to update 100 posts, but am getting to it. I just made an update to this post.
Since SiteGround’s big update to SG Optimizer, I now think it’s a good replacement to WP Rocket since it has many more features.
But as for SiteGround, they have increased prices (again), have strict CPU limits, and better, faster, cloud hosting options are available for a lower cost. There is a huge shift of people moving away from SiteGround (usually to Cloudways) because of these complaints – especially if you look in Facebook Groups. I already migrated this site over and am very happy.
awesome write up… question… did you see a jump in traffic/keyword rankings when you made the switch? thx!
Honestly, not a noticeable difference in SEO but could definitely tell it was faster when browsing through pages and measuring it in tools like Search Console. My site was already well optimized though. Paying 1/2 the price ($100 less than on SiteGround) was noticeable.