NameHero and A2 Hosting both offer LiteSpeed hosting, so which one’s better?
NameHero uses LiteSpeed servers on all plans while A2 only uses it on the higher 2 plans. Another big difference is you get more RAM on most NameHero plans except the highest one which has the same amount as A2’s highest plan (4GB). NameHero’s VPS plans also have more CPU/RAM and only A2’s highest VPS plan (Mach) uses LiteSpeed. NameHero also much better uptimes if you check their uptime page vs. A2’s which can have long, frequent maintenance. NameHero’s support is better, but their data centers are only in the US/Netherlands. While they’re not as popular as A2 Hosting, they generally have better feedback in Facebook groups. I generally recommend their Turbo Cloud which comes with 3 CPU cores, 3GB RAM, and NVMe.
A2 Hosting has been around longer than NameHero but many people argue their service has declined with frequent downtimes, long support wait times, and a ransomware attack which caused major outages. Only their more expensive plans (i.e. Turbo Boost and Turbo Max) use LiteSpeed. Like NameHero, A2 also uses cPanel. They have a slightly worse TrustPilot rating (4.4/5 instead of 4.7/5) with most complaints relating to the poor support, outages, and billing. One of the only benefits of using A2 is they have a data center in Asia while NameHero doesn’t.
|Feedback Facebook||Excellent||Not Great|
|CPU + RAM||More RAM||Less RAM|
|Outages||No Major Outages||Outages + Maintenance|
|LiteSpeed Server||All Plans||Only Higher Plans|
|LiteSpeed Cache||LiteSpeed Cache||LiteSpeed Cache|
|Inodes||250,000 - 500,000||300,000 - 600,000|
|Price||Cheap For 1-3 Years||Cheap For 3 Years Upfront|
Affiliate Disclaimer: I use affiliate links in this post and appreciate your support.
1. Facebook Feedback – What People Say About NameHero vs. A2 Hosting
Hosting reviews are always biased, so here’s some feedback from the multiple Facebook Groups I’m part of (you can join the WordPress Hosting and WP Speed Matters Groups and search for unbiased feedback there). Most people favor NameHero over A2 Hosting for the same reasons I mentioned in this post: better support, reliable uptimes, and more resources.
2. CPU + RAM – NameHero Includes More RAM On 3/4 Plans
NameHero’s lowest 3 plans have more RAM (1GB, 2GB, 3GB) while A2’s lowest 3 plans have less (700MB, 1GB, 2GB). Both use 4GB RAM on the highest plan. Which means unless you’re using the higher plan, NameHero includes more RAM on all their plans. CPU cores are the same.
3. Outages – A2 Hosting Has Frequent Maintenance + Downtimes
A2 Hosting consistently shows multiple interruptions in a single day, but you can easily get no previous incidents in the last 7 days with NameHero. Uptimes tests aren’t accurate since it all depends on which server, location, and node your website is hosted on. Don’t listen to BS tests.
Both A2 and NameHero had an outage (A2’s was for 14 days on Windows servers when they had a ransomware attack) while NameHero’s was 2 days on a specific node. NameHero posted their response here. No host’s uptimes are perfect and even SiteGround had a major issue where their DNS was blocked by Googlebot for 4 days. Regardless, uptimes are the single biggest reason to use NameHero over A2 since they have much less “frequent maintenance.”
4. Support – NameHero Wins Hands Down
NameHero’s support is significantly better than A2 Hosting.
- US-based support
- Minimal wait times
- No hard upsells on services
- Genuinely helpful people behind the scenes
While support is usually something you have to experience yourself, you can find many complaints about A2’s support in Facebook Groups and on their TrustPilot profile. Complaints are usually about them being slow, unhelpful, upsells, and bad billing practices. NameHero wins.
5. LiteSpeed Server – All NameHero Plans, On Higher A2 Plans
All NameHero plans come with LiteSpeed servers but only higher A2 Hosting plans use LiteSpeed like their Turbo Boost and Turbo Max plan (shared hosting) and Mach plan (VPS hosting). Lower plans use Apache. If you’re on a budget but still want LiteSpeed, use NameHero.
LiteSpeed servers are a new, faster type of server which outperforms Apache and traditional hosting. Plus, as long as you’re on a LiteSpeed server, you can use the LiteSpeed Cache Plugin with QUIC.cloud which is very fast and usually faster than setups like WP Rocket + Cloudflare.
6. LiteSpeed Cache – Why You Should Use This Plugin
Since NameHero and most A2 Hosting plans use LiteSpeed, you should be using the LiteSpeed Cache plugin.
LiteSpeed Cache is faster than WP Rocket and most cache plugins since it uses server-side caching which is faster than WP Rocket’s file-based caching (it also has a 4.8/5 star review).
Just make sure you configure the LiteSpeed Cache settings correctly (request a domain key, setup QUIC.cloud, use Redis or memcached, and enable browser caching, page, and image optimizations). Your website should be significantly faster after setting up LiteSpeed Cache.
7. CDN – QUIC.cloud CDN Integrates With LiteSpeed
QUIC.cloud CDN was built specifically to work on LiteSpeed.
So there’s no reason you should pay for WP Rocket and paid CDNs with NameHero or A2 Hosting. You will setup QUIC.cloud CDN through the LiteSpeed Cache plugin in the CDN settings, go to your QUIC.cloud dashboard, and set it up using a CNAME record. Make sure static/dynamic cache are enabled in QUIC.cloud, then you’re all set! Of course, you can use Cloudflare with both. To see a CDN comparison, go to cdnperf.com. QUIC.cloud isn’t listed yet.
8. Server Locations – They’re Mostly In The US
Most NameHero and A2 data centers are in the US (and some in NE, Europe, and Asia).
This is a con for both hosts because choosing a data center close to visitors has a big impact on TTFB. So if your visitors aren’t in these locations, you should really look somewhere else like Cloudways who has 44 data centers. If your visitors are located in these areas – all the better.
|Lansing, Michigan (USA) (3x)||Michigan (USA)|
|Phoenix, Arizona (USA)||Arizona (USA)|
|Kansas City, Missouri (USA)||Amsterdam (Europe)|
|Amsterdam (Netherlands)||Singapore (Asia)|
|View NameHero's Data Centers||View A2 Hosting's Data Centers|
9. Inodes – A2 Hosting Has Slightly Higher File Limits
Inodes (files) can grow quickly especially when you use your hosting for email.
Emails take up a large amount of files which also takes up inodes, storage, and even server resources (this is a big reason why some hosts like Kinsta and Cloudways don’t even support email hosting and encourage you to use something like Google Workspace). While it’s always best to keep your web/email hosting separate, A2 has higher inode limits if you use it for email.
10. Security – NameHero Does A Better Job
Considering A2’s ransomware attack, NameHero wins in the security category.
Both have many security features to protect your website, but I always recommend going through a WordPress security checklist yourself because you never know what will happen.
11. cPanel – Used By Both NameHero And A2 Hosting
Both NameHero and A2 Hosting use cPanel, but NameHero’s general dashboard is cleaner.
They recently redesigned their website and made the dashboard much better for UI/UX. Installing WordPress, Cloudflare, changing PHP versions, and other tasks are easy in cPanel.
12. Price – A2 Hosting Is Expensive Unless You Pay 3 Years Upfront
NameHero is very affordable for 1-3 years, but A2 Hosting makes you sign up for 3 years or you’ll pay a much higher price.
A2’s plans can be confusing since they offer shared, managed WordPress, unmanaged, VPS, and several other types of hosting. Make sure you look at A2’s features page (as well as NameHero’s features page) to see what each plan comes with. A2 lists features that are part of LiteSpeed Cache and QUIC (which NameHero has too) but I wouldn’t call this part of their hosting service.
13. Free Migration – Offered By Both Hosts
NameHero and A2 Hosting both offer a free site migration. At the time of writing this, NameHero only includes a free migration if you sign up for 2 years (A2 doesn’t have conditions).
14. TrustPilot Rating – NameHero Has Better TrustPilot Reviews
NameHero has a slightly better TrustPilot rating. Although I don’t trust these reviews completely (most of them are funneled through the host’s support), it can often give a good indication on whether a host has good support or not, and that they care about their reviews.
15. Winner – NameHero Is Better Than A2 Hosting
NameHero is better than A2 Hosting in terms of uptimes, support, LiteSpeed on all plans, and more flexible pricing. You also get more RAM on nearly all NameHero plans compared to A2.
Even though they’re a newer host, the CEO (Ryan) is a genuinely helpful person which you can see in his YouTube videos. I have used both A2 Hosting (for my girlfriend’s restaurant website) and NameHero (for my own smaller personal websites) and can definitely say NameHero wins.
You can get started for as little as $40 for your first year on their Starter Cloud plan.
Is NameHero or A2 Hosting better?
NameHero has more reliable uptimes and uses LiteSpeed on all plans, while A2 Hosting has frequent maintenance and only uses LiteSpeed on higher plans. NameHero's pricing is more flexible (and usually cheaper) and their support is arguably better.
Should I use NameHero or A2 Hosting for LiteSpeed?
While both NameHero and A2 Hosting offer LiteSpeed servers, NameHero uses LiteSpeed on all plans while A2 Hosting only uses it on higher plans, then uses Apache on lower plans.
NameHero vs. A2 Hosting speed - which one's faster?
Since NameHero and A2 Hosting use a similar setup with LiteSpeed, you can expect similar speeds on both. However, NameHero's usually has more CPU/RAM compared to A2 plans.