Bluehost is more popular than NameHero, but they’re not better.
NameHero uses faster LiteSpeed servers and NVMe storage on higher plans compared to Bluehost’s slower Apache servers and SSD. Even when comparing CPU/RAM with Bluehost’s VPS plans, NameHero is cheaper and you get more resources with faster NVMes. Even though Bluehost and NameHero use cPanel with similar pricing models, NameHero’s technology is faster behind the scenes. And since NameHero uses LiteSpeed, you can use the free LiteSpeed Cache plugin with QUIC.cloud CDN which uses server-level caching, HTTP/3, and addresses core web vitals. They are also transparent about uptimes with their uptime status page which has less frequent maintenance compared to similar hosts (Bluehost has no uptime status page).
Bluehost is overhyped and mainly promoted by affiliates. They’re owned by EIG who is infamous for overcrowding servers which results in a slow TTFB and poor core web vitals. Support is slow and it can take hours to reach someone (which is mainly why they have bad TrustPilot reviews). They also have frequent downtimes shown on downdetector.com. Since their speed, support, and uptimes aren’t great, there’s no reason to use them over NameHero. You’re also more likely to get CPU issues since Apache is less efficient compared to LiteSpeed.
|Pros & Cons||Mostly pros||Mostly cons|
|Storage||NVMe on higher plans||Slower SSDs|
|CPU resources||Efficient with LiteSpeed||Throttling + 503 errors|
|Inodes||250,000 – 500,000||200,000|
|Price||Cheap + high renewals||Cheap + high renewals|
|Support||Fast + helpful||Long wait imes|
|Migrations||Free||Free on “qualified” Accounts|
|Facebook Feedback||Excellent||Many complaints|
|Affiliate Hype||Average||Too much|
Disclaimer: I use aff links to NameHero (not Bluehost) since they’re the better choice.
1. Pros & Cons Of NameHero vs. Bluehost
- Faster LiteSpeed servers.
- Faster NVMe SSD storage.
- LSC is arguably the fastest cache plugin.
- QUIC.cloud CDN (free CDN for LiteSpeed).
- Can sign up for 1-3 years with cheap intro price.
- Better support as reflected in TrustPilot reviews.
- Less chance of 5xx errors with efficient LiteSpeed.
- Cheaper with more server resources than Bluehost.
- Green-friendly (they briefly mentioned this in their blog).
- Better reputation in Facebook Groups and unbiased forums.
- High renewal prices (like Bluehost).
- Data centers are only in the US + Netherlands.
- Relatively cheap.
- Free SSL (same with NameHero).
- Free domain same with NameHero).
- Free migration (same with NameHero).
- cPanel is user-friendly (same on NameHero).
- Apache servers.
- Slower SSD storage.
- Overcrowded servers = slow TTFB.
- Bluehost’s support can be very slow.
- Premium cache plugin/CDN not included.
- High renewal prices (same as NameHero).
- Many downtime reports on downdetector.com.
- History of malware scams for no apparent reason.
- Lower inode limits can result in account suspension.
- Feedback is terrible if you search Facebook Groups.
- Too much affiliate promotion leaves bad taste in mouth.
2. Speed – NameHero (LiteSpeed) Is Faster Than Bluehost (Apache)
This also means you can use the LiteSpeed Cache plugin with QUIC.cloud CDN which are both free and built for LiteSpeed. It’s faster than WP Rocket because it uses server-side caching and HTTP/3. LiteSpeed Cache also has excellent reviews. With Bluehost, you will need to buy WP Rocket and use Cloudflare (or even BunnyCDN) to get the best results. Not only are you saving money when using NameHero, but you’re also using a server + cache plugin that is much faster.
Ryan from NameHero has a helpful video on setting up LiteSpeed Cache with HTTP/3 & QUIC.
Most EIG hosting brands (including Bluehost) are infamous for overcrowding their servers to save money because their parent is a publicly traded company controlled by sharky investors.
3. Storage – NameHero Uses Faster NVMe SSDs Than Bluehost’s SSDs
NameHero’s higher Turbo Cloud and Business plans use NVMe SSDs which have faster read/write speeds, faster data transfer, and lower latency than slower SSDs used on Bluehost.
4. CPU Resources – Bluehost Throttles Bandwidth Leading To Errors
503 errors can be common on Bluehost’s shared hosting due to low CPU limits.
Since LiteSpeed servers are more efficient than Apache, you’re already much less likely to run into CPU issues on NameHero. A CPU spike can be caused by plugins, scripts, malware, traffic, among other things. In this case, Bluehost will throttle your bandwidth which can make your site extremely slow, unusable, and result in 503 errors. This is why most people upgrade plans.
5. Inodes – Don’t Store Too Many Files On Bluehost
Each hosting plan only allows a certain amount of inodes (files).
Bluehost only has 200,000 inodes on all shared hosting plans. NameHero has 250,000 inodes on the Starter/Plus Cloud plan, then 500,000 inodes on Turbo Cloud and Business Cloud plans. So if you’re planning on using your hosting account for email hosting too (or store other things which can increase files), you probably want to use NameHero’s Turbo or Business Cloud plan.
6. Dashboard – Both Hosts Use cPanel
Both NameHero and Bluehost use cPanel.
I personally like cPanel especially since other hosts like SiteGround’s Site Tools can lack features (especially true with GoDaddy’s dashboard). And Cloudways can be confusing for beginners. Installing WordPress, activating Cloudflare, upgrading PHP versions, and doing other things in cPanel is usually relatively easy on both hosts. So this would obviously be a tie.
7. Data Centers – NameHero Only Has Data Centers In The US + Netherlands
NameHero has 4 data center locations (3 in the US, 1 in the Netherlands). Bluehost has 2 US data centers and 4 throughout the world. Choosing a data center close to your visitors impacts your TTFB, so this is a con to both hosts if there’s no close data centers. If you need a closer data center, I use Cloudways who has 44 server locations throughout the world and has a fast TTFB.
|NameHero Data Centers||Bluehost Data Centers|
|Lansing, Michigan (USA) (3x)||Provo, Utah (US)|
|Phoenix, Arizona (USA)||Orem, Utah (US)|
|Kansas City, Missouri (USA)||Mumbai (IND)|
|Amsterdam (Netherlands)||London, UK (EU)|
|–||Hong Kong (CN)|
|–||Shanghai, Mainland (CN)|
|View NameHero’s Data Centers||Not Listed On Website|
8. Uptimes – Bluehost Can Have Downtimes
There are always quite a few reports of Bluehost downtimes on downdetector.com.
NameHero has much better uptimes if you check their uptimes status page. It’s a good thing when a host has an uptime status page and is transparent about it. NameHero usually has very few (if any) weekly incidents. Bluehost doesn’t have an uptime status page which is a red flag.
9. Price – You Get More (And Faster) Resources With NameHero
NameHero offers affordable pricing for 1-3 years while Bluehost only gives a cheap price for 1 year. You can sign up for 3 years on Bluehost but it’s not very cheap. Both have higher renewals.
For around $8/month, you can get NameHero’s Turbo Cloud plan which comes with LiteSpeed, NVMe SSDs, 3 CPU cores, 3GB RAM, and 500,000 inodes. That’s the plan I usually recommend which is a better value compared to Bluehost Apache servers, SATA SSDs, and 250,000 inodes.
Even when you compare NameHero’s managed cloud VPS plans to Bluehost’s, almost all NameHero plans give you more CPU cores (and they all use NVMe, MariaDB, and PHP-FPM).
10. Support – NameHero’s Is Faster And More Helpful
TrustPilot ratings are a good indication of whether the support is good.
NameHero has an excellent 4.7/5 star rating while Bluehost has a 3.1/5 star rating. There are tons of complaints on Facebook Groups and social media about Bluehost’s support (usually because it’s slow and you can be on hold for hours). NameHero posts their support feedback directly on their website and you can reach their team instantly through phone, chat, or email.
11. Migrations – Bluehost’s Is Only For “Qualified Accounts”
12. Facebook Feedback – Bluehost Has A Bad Reputation
A little research in Facebook Groups should tell you whether NameHero or Bluehost is better. Since hosting reviews are extremely biased, here is some feedback from the groups I’m part of.
13. Affiliate Hype – Bluehost Is Mainly Promoted By Affiliates
The amount of Bluehost affiliates is insane.
Search “how to start a blog” and about 7/10 first page results try to get you to sign up for Bluehost. But anyone who has been around the block with hosts knows Bluehost isn’t a good choice. They may offer higher commissions than NameHero (and are easier to sell because of their heavy advertising). But just because you see Bluehost more doesn’t mean they’re better.
14. Winner – NameHero Is Faster And Better Than Bluehost
NameHero is better than Bluehost especially since they use LiteSpeed and you can use LiteSpeed Cache. They also have better support with more reliable uptimes at similar prices.
Just remember to use my LiteSpeed Cache tutorial!
Who is better - NameHero or Bluehost?
Even though Bluehost is more popular, NameHero has faster hosting with LiteSpeed servers + NVMe SSDs at a similar price. They also have better support/uptimes than Bluehost, and LiteSpeed Cache with QUIC.cloud are free with no paid tools needed.
Is NameHero or Bluehost faster?
NameHero uses LiteSpeed servers which are faster than Bluehost's Apache servers. NameHero uses NVMe SSD storage while Bluehost uses slower SSDs. LiteSpeed Cache is also faster than any other cache plugin you can use on Bluehost with server-side caching.
NameHero vs. Bluehost - which is better for WordPress?
NameHero has more WordPress features than Bluehost mainly because you can use the LiteSpeed Cache plugin and QUIC.cloud CDN. Both use cPanel which also has Cloudflare.